Comments for factstoknow.co.uk

Comment on Andrew Lansley Tory Health minster accepted £21,000 donation from private health firm boss by Sherron Sitterson

Sherron Sitterson — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:23:36 +0000

I think this is among the most important info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But wanna observation on some common issues, The web site taste is great, the articles is really excellent : D. Good task, cheers

Comment on Andrew Lansley Tory Health minster accepted £21,000 donation from private health firm boss by Azucena Mcmorran

Azucena Mcmorran — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:09:22 +0000

Great website. A lot of helpful information here. I’m sending it to several pals ans additionally sharing in delicious. And naturally, thanks on your effort!

Comment on Kate Middleton joins the future in-laws Prince Harry and Princess Beatrice at friends’ wedding by onkelseoserbe

onkelseoserbe — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:04:23 +0000

I will right away grasp your rss as I can not in finding your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Kindly let me understand in order that I may subscribe. Thanks.

Comment on Man Found Guilty of Murder in Connecticut Home Invasion Case by Mary Salomon

Mary Salomon — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:29:41 +0000

Where were his cognitive difficulties in all of the decisions this monster made on July 23, 2007? He followed a family home to see exactly where they lived, called his partner in crime another pure animal, and they both plotted exactly what they were going to do to this innocent family.

He has beaten, sexually assaulted, robbed, murdered, and actually took disturbing photos of his victims. It doesn’t sound to me like this trash has any cognitive difficulties. The only difficulties this loser has is a sickness called “I am pure evil” and I must be destroyed quickly, and take my loser partner in crime with me!

I can’t even believe Steven Hayes is still alive. Dig a hole, strip them bare, put a bullet in their little pea brains, and let the birds pick on them. They are not worth the money it is going to cost to feed them, clothe them, and keep a cell over their unworthy heads. Case closed. Next…..

Comment on Man Found Guilty of Murder in Connecticut Home Invasion Case by Felicia Cardone

Felicia Cardone — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:19:21 +0000

It is so unusual how Joshua Komisarjevsky’s so called “cognitive difficulties” didn’t magically appear when he was plotting this gruesome attack against this innocent family and when he was watching Michaela and Jennifer in Stop and Shop. This imaginary illness he has only magically appeared when it was time to decide whether or not he should burn this family alive. I hope the judge experiences “cognitive difficulties” when the death penalty verdict is decided.

Shame on the defense for defending this trash and making excuses for his inhumane behavior. I truly do not know how they were able to defend him and still sleep at night. I guess money does talk, and obviously a whole bunch of bull$hit does walk. Shame on you. I believe that what comes around goes around. Do you have wives and children? God sees everything and he sure doesn’t like ugly.

Comment on Shafilea Ahmed’s parents charged with her murder by kids

kids — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:55:39 +0000

parenting…

[...]Shafilea Ahmed’s parents charged with her murder « factstoknow.co.uk[...]…

Comment on Cameron puts the brake on NHS reforms to limit political damage by Review Panic Away

Review Panic Away — Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:53:37 +0000

Review Panic Away…

[...]Cameron puts the brake on NHS reforms to limit political damage « factstoknow.co.uk[...]…

Comment on Growing backlash against TSA body scanners, pat-downs by Snapscan

Snapscan — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 06:40:36 +0000

you are in point of fact a just right webmaster. The website loading pace is incredible. It sort of feels that you are doing any unique trick. In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve done a wonderful activity in this subject!

Comment on News Oct. 1st 2010 by arbeidsongeval

arbeidsongeval — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:06:48 +0000

I found your weblog web site on google and examine a number of of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the superb operate. I simply further up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking ahead to studying extra from you in a while!…

Comment on Offender photos ‘to be added to crime maps’ (UK) by Sally Ramage

Sally Ramage — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:02:25 +0000

In June 2011 there were UK news reports that the Home Office is considering the addition of offenders’ photographs to local crime maps. The government, confirmed this news in the the Sunday Times newspaper and the Minister for Policing and Justice, the Right Honourable Nick Herbert is alleged to have told The Sunday Times that the plan was to increase transparency and accountability. The article cited what it called a ‘trailblazing project’ in West Yorkshire which identifies criminals; in other words, the government has undertaken a pilot study of criminals in West Yorkshire. The news reports state (because they are still online and therefore in the present tense), that the Policing and Criminal Justice Crime Minister Nick Herbert is alleged to have said:
‘We want to build on the success of the police.uk crime mapping website by adding more information about how offences are actually dealt with in the criminal justice system. A trailblazing project is being run by West Yorkshire police to map justice outcomes. We are determined to increase transparency and enable the public to hold the justice system to account.’
The crime maps for England and Wales were launched onto the Internet in February 2011 and allow users to see which offences have been reported in their local streets by entering a postcode or street name.
It was reported that Ms. Shami Chakrabarti, director of the activist organisation ‘Liberty’ dismissed the Home Office plan as ‘a macho piece of posturing’, missing the golden opportunity to throw mud in their face since she could have cited the still important case of Peck v United Kingdom [2003] 36 EHRR 41, in which decision the European Court of Human Rights stated that:
‘the disclosure of footage had resulted in Mr Peck’s actions being observed to an extent far exceeding any exposure to a passer-by or to a security observation and to an extent surpassing that which the applicant could have foreseen. Accordingly, the disclosure by the Council of that footage (even though it was allowed by section 163 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994) had resulted in a serious interference with the applicant’s right to respect for private life.’
With regard to any defence of ‘necessity’ the Court stressed that:
‘…such disclosure without the consent of the individual called for the most careful scrutiny by the European Court and could only be justified by an overriding requirement in the public interest.’
The mapping news report alleges that Chakrabarti told BBC One’s The Andrew Marr Show that it was interesting that in ‘one of the worst recessions this country has ever faced, everybody – opposition and government – [is] posturing on law and order, often with relatively minor tweaks.’
Furthermore, since information on the crime map website is set out to prevent victims from being identified, identifying the alleged offenders may cause victims to also be identified. Yet again, should such an action be taken (of placing offenders’ photos online, where the whole world may view them, may trigger unforseeable litigation, not to mention that this flies in the face of government posturing to ‘restorative justice’.

In this regard, she is one hundred percent correct. It has not gone unnoticed that this government has busied itself with passing into law nearly one hundred titbits of minor amendments, classified mostly as statutes and for the general public not ‘in the know’, the wool has been pulled over their eyes into thinking how very wonderful and hard-working these new incumbents are.
Almost all of these so-called statutes could have been aggregated into one single, corrective and consolidating statute. It reminds me of cleaning personnel who feel compelled to move all one’s possessions and rearrange elsewhere because the house appears different and they appear to have done their job.